Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Thursday, May 22, 2008

More-Powerful Fuel Cells

A cheap polymer material increases the power output of methanol fuel cells by 50 percent.

By Katherine Bourzac

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Polymer power: An inexpensive polymer thin film increases the power output of methanol fuel cells by 50 percent.
Credit: Avni Argun and Nathan Ashcraft, MIT
Multimedia
video  Watch an MIT engineer work with a new material for fuel cells.

Methanol fuel cells have the potential to replace batteries as a lightweight power source for portable electronic devices. But fuel-cell materials are expensive, and fuel cells that consume methanol are inefficient. In particular, the membranes used in methanol fuel cells are expensive and waste fuel. Now researchers at MIT have developed a cheap membrane material that increases the power output of methanol fuel cells by 50 percent.

The energy density of a methanol fuel cell "compares to the best high-energy-density batteries," says Robert Savinell, a chemical engineer at Case Western Reserve University, in Cleveland, who was not involved in the research. And because they weigh less than batteries, methanol fuel cells are a promising power source for portable electronics. For the military, tanks of methanol for refilling fuel cells would be lighter than extra batteries that would have to be carried on long missions. The energy density of methanol fuel cells could also be an advantage in portable consumer electronic devices such as laptops and iPods. But commercialization of methanol fuel cells has been limited because of their price: they require a thick internal membrane made of an expensive polymer. And even with this expensive material, they use fuel inefficiently.

To overcome these limitations, Paula Hammond, a chemical engineer at MIT, has made a fuel-cell membrane out of layers of polymers whose electrochemical properties can be precisely tuned to prevent fuel waste. The work is described in a recent issue of Advanced Materials. Indeed, says Savinell, Hammond has solved a problem that chemists have been trying to overcome for years.

Methanol fuel cells have two compartments separated by a membrane. On one side, methanol is stripped of protons and electrons. The protons are carried through the membrane to the other compartment, where they are combined with oxygen to form water. The electrons, which can't cross the membrane, are forced into an external current that can be used to power electronic devices.

Because water is being created inside the fuel cell, the membrane is wet. Methanol, which is very soluble in water, is absorbed by conventional fuel-cell membranes and can cross over to the other side. This wastes fuel and makes the cathode, the oxidizing end of the cell, work harder. "Everyone's concerned about methanol crossover," says Merlin Bruening, a chemist at Michigan State University. Researchers have tried many different approaches to improving methanol fuel-cell membranes, but all have entailed trade-offs. "The challenge is to maintain stability and conductivity [to protons]," while decreasing methanol crossover, says Bruening.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • ethanol fuel cells
    dmm on 05/23/2008 at 9:58 AM
    Posts:
    136
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I'm guessing our soldiers would love for the Army to implement ethanol fuel cells.  Talk about dual use!
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • methanol, so what?
    kovavla on 05/26/2008 at 1:29 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    Methanol can be efficiently produced from a wide variety of sources including still abundant fossil fuels (natural gas, coal, oil shale, tar sands, etc.), but also agricultural products and municipal waste, wood and varied biomass  (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methanol_economy ).

    Now, if methanol will be produced mainly from natural gas, coal, oil and tar sands,     then what is new? We still add CO2 to the atmosphere and we still deplete the atmosphere of oxygen.

    (A CO2 based greenhouse effect has never been proven scientifically btw, this is media hype: repeat the message over again, and we start to believe it.)

    Methanol as energy form is as dubious as hydrogen as energy form, and do not have the high efficiency as electricity  (efficiency = efficiency of creation, transport and usage of intermediate energy form).
    Why should we replace an efficient energy infra-structure (electricity networks) by an inefficient one?

    As long as academia is dominated by a few "enlightened" dictators, stupidity will be the output.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Energy density
    Siphon on 06/03/2008 at 3:55 AM
    Posts:
    91
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    First, the energy density is stated as being similar to high end batteries, but then it is stated that they weigh less than batteries? Which one is it?
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology