Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Spit Sensor Spots Oral Cancer

An ultrasensitive optical protein sensor analyzes saliva.

By Brittany Sauser

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Analyzing spit: Leyla Sabet, a member of the UCLA research team that built the new optical protein sensor, sits in front of the device. Based on a confocal microscope, the ultrasensitive system is being used by the researchers to detect biomarkers in saliva samples that are linked to oral cancer.
Credit: UCLA

For the first time, an optical sensor, developed by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), can measure proteins in saliva that are linked to oral cancer. The device is highly sensitive, allowing doctors and dentists to detect the disease early, when patient survival rates are high.

The researchers are currently working with the National Institute of Health (NIH) to push the technology to clinical tests so that it can be developed into a device that can be used in dentists' offices. Chih-Ming Ho, a scientist at UCLA and principal investigator for the sensor, says that it is a versatile instrument and can be used to detect other disease-specific biomarkers.

When oral cancer is identified in its early stages, patient survival rate is almost 90 percent, compared with 50 percent when the disease is advanced, says Carter Van Waes, chief of head and neck surgery at the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be 35,310 new cases of oral cancer in the United States in 2008. Early forms are hard to detect just by visual examination of the mouth, says Van Waes, so physicians either have to perform a biopsy--remove tissue for testing--or analyze proteins in blood.

Detecting cancer biomarkers in saliva would be a much easier test to perform, but it is also technically more challenging: protein markers are harder to spot in saliva than in blood. To create the ultrasensitive sensor, researchers started with a glass substrate coated with a protein called streptavidin that enables other biomolecules to bind to the substrate and to one another. The researchers then added a molecule that would catch and bind the cancer biomarker--a protein in saliva called IL-8 that previous research has proved to be related to oral cancer. They also added molecules designed to keep the glass surface free of other proteins that might muddy detection of the biomarker. To visualize the target molecules, Ho's team then added a set of fluorescently tagged proteins designed to attach to the captured IL-8 markers.

Because saliva has a lower concentration of proteins than blood does, the team needed a highly sensitive method to detect the tagged proteins among the background noise, stray molecules in saliva that also fluoresce. So the researchers used a confocal microscope--an imaging system that employs a laser to collect the light generated from a sample--to analyze the saliva. Ho and his team found that focusing the laser light on a specific part of the sample resulted in a higher signal-to-noise ratio, allowing them to detect lower concentrations of the cancer biomarker.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • ELISA
    scottymdphd on 08/06/2008 at 11:10 AM
    Posts:
    1
    elisa is not an invasive test- it is used for HIV saliva tests, drug urine screens, etc.  These guys are just trying to hype up an expensive machine for everyone to buy.  perhaps it is more sensitive, but there are alot of other ways the sensitivity of an elisa-based test could be ramped up without creating a $500K machine with lots of disposable expensive reagents.  this is far from a breakthrough.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Already a test
    ArtInvent on 08/06/2008 at 2:04 PM
    Posts:
    18
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    My dentist in California has already offered me an oral cancer screening test. They swish around a solution in the mouth and look at it under a special light (if I remember correctly.) It's surprising this article makes no mention of how this new test compares to the one already on the market.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • signal to noise
    jtd@wsu.edu on 08/06/2008 at 2:45 PM
    Posts:
    1
    The statement:   'Ho and his team found that focusing the laser light on a specific part of the sample resulted in a lower signal-to-noise ratio... '

    Should read higher signal-to-noise.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: signal to noise
      Brittany Sauser on 08/07/2008 at 9:51 AM
      Technology Review TR Staff
      Web Producer and Technology Reporter
      Posts:
      23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Thank you for pointing out his mistake, it has been fixed in the article.
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology