Scientists hope to create a cell model to study heart disease.
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
By Emily Singer
British scientists will use pig eggs and DNA from a human patient
with heart disease to generate stem cells. If successful, these will be the
first human stem cells made from animal eggs.
A shortage of human eggs--a central ingredient in the
cloning process--has stalled
human cloning, so scientists are studying whether animal eggs can do the
trick. (Two groups in the United
Kingdom have already been given permission
to move forward with hybrid research.) The concept of human-animal hybrids has proved
controversial, but scientists will only generate cells from the research; they
won't let the embryos develop.
According to an article in the Guardian,
Although the stem cells will not contain any animal DNA, they will not be
suitable for treating humans directly. Instead, the scientists will use the
cells to learn how genetic mutations cause heart cells to malfunction and
ultimately cause life-threatening cardiomyopathy. "Ultimately they will help us understand where some of the problems
associated with these diseases arise, and they could also provide models for
the pharmaceutical industry to test new drugs," [Warwick
Medical School
scientist Justin] St John
says. "We will effectively be creating and studying these diseases in a
dish, but it's important to say that we're at the very early stages of this
research and it will take a considerable amount of time."
Human-animal hybrid research has received much more
attention in the United Kingdom
than in the United States,
largely because the research there is governed by a central regulatory board,
and details of research proposals are made public. No broad-arching regulation
exists in the United States,
where scientists are mainly accountable to university ethical review boards.
Helio offered the feature-packed Cadillac of the mobile Web, but it couldn't make money.
Friday, June 27, 2008
By David Talbot

Credit: Toby Pederson
I had the chance to
visit the Helio headquarters in Westwood, CA,
last year to write this feature story on the
company's ambitions. Now comes news
that Virgin Mobile USA is buying
Helio for $39 million, making for an impressive burn rate on the $710 million
invested in Helio by Earthlink and the Korean phone giant SK Telecom over three
years. (The companies' initial joint investment of $440 million, which I
reported in the feature, was followed by a $270 million infusion from SK
Telecom.) Both Virgin Mobile and Helio had been small players in the mobile
markets, buying capacity on the Sprint Nextel networks to run their businesses.
Helio's offerings will remain available from Virgin Mobile.
Helio was ahead of
conventional American tastes, offering high-end, do-it-all services and devices
for the mobile Web. It broke ground with all-inclusive data plans, integration
with sites like MySpace and YouTube, and unified e-mail interfaces. Of the many
statistics the company loved to toss around, one stood out: 95 percent of Helio
users actually accessed the Web from their Helio gadgets. (The rest of us
mainly use our cell phones for voice calls or text messages; only 13 percent pay
for Web features on mobile phones.)
But while Helio's
most ambitious device, the Ocean, was mechanically interesting, it may have
been too much so. It had dual sliders and a full Qwerty keyboard, and its beefy
size recalled that of an eyeglass case. But the Ocean was in development at the
same time that Apple was secretly developing its own do-everything gadget. The sleek,
touch-screen iPhone launched around the same time as the Ocean, and the rest is
history.
Students unveil an enclosed electric motorcycle.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
By Kristina Grifantini
 Credit: Lauren Rugani
At today's second annual EurekaFest, top high-school
innovators from around the country gathered at MIT to demonstrate their inventions.
One of the most notable was a motorcycle designed to be both safer and greener
than the average 'cycle: it's electrically powered and built with an enclosure
fitted with compressible brackets--"crush zones"--in case of a collision.
The motorcycle operates on five lithium-ion batteries and
can recharge in three hours from a standard wall outlet. It weighs only about 220
pounds and is designed with a low center of gravity for stability. It can reach
about 60 miles per hour and can go 40 miles without a recharge, which
can be done onboard. The first prototype cost around $12,000 to build, but the
team that invented it, from Saint Thomas
Academy, in Minnesota, expects that subsequent models
will be about half the price, since part of the cost was designing and
developing custom molds.
This year's $500,000 Lemelson-MIT Prize, around
which EurekaFest is organized, will be presented tonight to Joseph DeSimone,
a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who has done
work developing polymers for medicine, particularly drug
delivery, and green
manufacturing. Martin Fisher, CEO of KickStart, won the $100,000 award for
sustainability research for his work on human-powered irrigation pumps.
When a 2-miles-per-gallon improvement is better than improving by 16 miles per gallon.
Friday, June 20, 2008
By Kevin Bullis
Say you've got two cars in your garage. One of them gets 34
miles per gallon; the other gets only 12. You drive both cars 10,000 miles in
the course of a year.
Would you save more gas by a) trading in the 34-miles-per-gallon
car for one that gets 50 miles per gallon, or by b) trading in the 12-miles-per-gallon
car for one that gets 14 miles per gallon?
New
experiments suggest that people tend to pick a). After all, a 16-miles-per-gallon
improvement seems better than an improvement of just 2 miles per gallon.
The right answer is b).
If you start driving the 50-miles-per-gallon car instead of
the 34-miles-per-gallon car, you'll save 94.1 gallons of gas per year.
If you start driving the 14-miles-per-gallon car instead of
the 12-miles-per-gallon car, you'll save 119 gallons per year.
The math is simple arithmetic. Divide the total number of
miles driven (10,000) by the miles per gallon to get the total gallons used to
drive that distance. For 12 miles per gallon, the answer is 833. For 14 miles
per gallon, it's 714.
The fact that people guess a) rather than b) suggests that
miles per gallon isn't a useful metric for describing a vehicle's gas
consumption, say the researchers who did the recent experiments. A much more
direct way to measure fuel consumption is an estimate of the amount of gas required
to travel a given distance.
Such a number would also make it easier to convey just how
much could be saved by moving closer to work or taking public transportation.
And it renders the difference between a 12-miles-per-gallon SUV and a 50-miles-per-gallon
hybrid more impressive, making it clear just how much fuel gas guzzlers are using.
It takes 833 gallons to travel 10,000 miles in the former vehicle; it only
takes 200 gallons to go 10,000 miles in the latter.
The batteries weren't at fault. Plug-ins are still a good idea.
Friday, June 20, 2008
By Kevin Bullis
Earlier this month, a plug-in hybrid caught
on fire. In May, another one
had suffered a "meltdown" of the battery pack. In both cases, no one
was hurt. But some advocates of the technology are worried that, because of the
incidents, plug-ins will get a bad name, and potential buyers will steer clear.
They shouldn't be worried.
Plug-in hybrids are like ordinary hybrids, but they have
bigger battery packs that can be recharged by plugging them in. That gives cars
extended electric range compared with conventional hybrids, which cuts down on
gas consumption.
Plug-ins are all the rage these days with politicians and
automakers, in whose minds they have apparently supplanted hydrogen fuel-cell
vehicles as the cars of the future. It seems unlikely that the recent incidents
will do much to change this. Both cars were aftermarket conversions of
conventional hybrids. Cars designed from the ground up as plug-in hybrids
aren't available yet. So the incidents throw into question the skill of those
who did the conversions; the incidents don't suggest that plug-in hybrids are, in
principle, a bad idea.
There might have been more cause for concern if the fire
were the result of the battery cells. One of the conversions reportedly used
battery cells from a
company enlisted to supply batteries for plug-in hybrids from GM. It
wouldn't look good if the batteries that GM intends to use started going up in
flames.
But apparently, the batteries weren't the problem in either
case. The fire and meltdown seem to have been caused by the electronics used in
the conversions. One hopes that offerings from major auto companies will be
better put together.
Right now, GM engineers are rushing to develop the GM Volt,
a type of plug-in hybrid that's supposed to be available by the end of 2010. If
those start bursting into flames after they roll off the assembly line, that
would indeed be bad news for the future of plug-in hybrids.
In testimony to the U.S. government, the University of Toronto's Ronald Deibert looks ahead to censorship during the Beijing Olympics and analyzes the current state of censorship in China.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
By Erica Naone
At the Beijing
Olympics, foreign journalists may encounter systems designed to give the false
appearance that Chinese Internet controls are minimal, according to Ronald Deibert, an associate
professor of political science and director of the Citizen Lab at the Munk
Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto.
Today, Deibert, whose research group makes the censorship-circumvention tool Psiphon, will
address the Beijing Olympics and other issues related to Chinese censorship in testimony
to the U.S. China Economic and Security Review Commission in Washington, DC, as
part of a hearing on access to
information and media control in China.
From his
testimony:
"There is
considerable speculation as to how the Chinese government will deal with
Internet controls during the upcoming Olympic games in Beijing. At least 30,000 foreign journalists
are accredited to the Olympic games, and Beijing
is contractually obliged to the International Olympic Committee to provide free
Internet access for them. How and whether that will be accomplished is so far
unknown, but there are several possible scenarios short of the unlikely rolling
back of all filters. For example, China may reduce or eliminate
controls over access to popular English language websites, news services, and
blogging platforms, while keeping in place or even enhancing filters on the
local language equivalents. This policy would give outsiders the impression
that restrictions are minimal while targeting those sources of information that
matter most for domestic policy. Already there is evidence that such a policy
has begun, with long-standing restrictions on the English language version of
the BBC news now lifted while the Chinese version of BBC remains inaccessible
to users in China.
China may also set aside a block of IP addresses for journalists that the
routers will ignore; it is unclear, however, how that system would work for
journalists accessing the Internet through multiple locations while traveling,
such as in Internet cafes outside of official Olympic sites. Whatever method is
ultimately employed, it seems highly probable that after the Olympics the
controls will return to the status quo
ante. Journalists covering the Olympic games would do well to come prepared
with a reliable circumvention method and a list of banned Chinese language
websites to check for accessibility."
Deibert's full
testimony, which also addresses ethical compromises made by U.S. companies operating in China and the
basic methods by which the Chinese government controls the Internet, is
available for download here.
|
|
|