VC hopes to capitalize on an increasingly scarce resource.
Wednesday, April 09, 2008
By Kevin Bullis
Oil, of course, dominates world economics and politics. But it's conceivable that some day, alternative fuels and other clean technologies, combined with the rising costs of extracting oil, could diminish petroleum's influence. But by that time, another scarce commodity--water--could come to dominate geopolitics, and venture capitalists are starting to take note.
The thinking goes like this. Biofuels are enormous consumers of water, says Jim Matheson, a general partner at Flagship Ventures, a venture capital firm in Cambridge, MA. And water is not always abundant where it's most needed. "So, increasingly you're going to see water as a scarce resource. I think it's going to drive not just economics but also a lot of geopolitical dynamics. So, we're trying to find technologies that can allow us to plug into this enormous value chain." He's interested, for example, in membranes and other water-treatment technologies that will allow biofuel-makers and others to reuse water. But he says there's a big challenge to making these new technologies successful. There has to be a way to scale them up to bring down costs. "The problem is that water is like the Internet. People love it and they use it all the time, but they don't want to pay for it," he says. "So the question is, how do you come up with a business model that actually works?"
One option, he says, is to develop technologies that can both clean up wastewater and extract energy from the waste, effectively adding value to the water. Matheson spoke as part of a panel on "green technology" investment at the Venture Summit East conference in Boston yesterday.
Comments
williammeadlynch on 04/11/2008 at 1:04 PM
1
UpComing on 04/11/2008 at 10:09 PM
2
When water becomes privately owned and managed for private use and some people end up without it or unable to afford it, they will revolt; because they will have to.
Yes, technology could/should be in the service of humanity. Those who develop useful technologies deserve ample reward. But ultimately, non-public control of water is in essence, immoral. If the technology leads to hegemonic control of the public resource (water) it will be enormously problematic. I sincerely hope that is not the aim of these developers.
javs on 04/12/2008 at 9:08 AM
74
gabrielg01 on 04/13/2008 at 6:20 PM
317
We will have premium brands like "RAINFOREST FRESH" or "MOUNTAIN BREEZE" or "BEACH SURF"...or whatever other bullsh*t names the marketing people will come up with.
One hundred years ago, if someone told you that water will be sold in stores, under "premium" brand names, you would have said that this person is insane. Well, insanity has become reality.
Way to go!
javs on 04/14/2008 at 10:51 AM
74
The third industrial revolution breakthrough market architecture and design paradigm is about eliminating government price controls in the retail markets. The result, the power industry will return back to operate under production capital.
Under EWPC, customers will be able to have a single retailer for a few utilities, like water, gas and electricity. Today's responsibility to serve, where customers can purchase unlimitated water, gas and electricity, is just unsustainable. To support the new open markets utilities will become just transportation utilities with a responsibility to transport in a correspnding controlled markets regulatory compact.
Read please about The Electricity Revolution under another comment above.
Lasertop on 04/15/2008 at 11:14 AM
5
Nope, better to panic.
gabrielg01 on 04/15/2008 at 5:39 PM
317
How are you going to resupply that amount of fresh water? How much energy would it take?
Have you heard about the Aral Sea and what happened to it? Look it up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Aralsee.gif
Lasertop on 04/15/2008 at 10:03 PM
5
Kevin Bullis on 04/16/2008 at 6:13 PM
Nanotechnology and Materials Science Editor
58
bkshilo on 04/21/2008 at 12:55 PM
17
zig158 on 04/16/2008 at 2:33 AM
64
Fresh water will never be an issue as long as we have the energy to move it to ware we need it, or make it from seawater. The more expensive the energy is, the more expensive the water will be. If we lick the energy problem, many of our other problems will simply evaporate.
jmaximus9 on 04/17/2008 at 1:36 AM
47
michigan32 on 08/06/2008 at 1:27 AM
1
hyperion4ever on 07/28/2008 at 5:01 PM
1
But I'm sure there will be lots of technologies that will help us to get drinking water from the sea or from air.
MickeyFouse on 11/25/2008 at 9:04 PM
19