Potential Energy

Kevin Bullis is Technology Review’s energy editor.
Recent Posts
Blog Topics
Recent Comments
- luddite
: Global warming is making us think, That unless we play fair, And stop polluting the air, The...
- Bob...
: Anything in an EV that is "consumed"? Nothing that I can think of in the sense of how ICEs...
- Bob...
: Might seem biased, but let's review a couple of facts. 1) We are not going to be able to produce...
- KGC
: I see a lot of reference about the military being considered a "hidden" subsidy. I would not...
- mkogrady
: We also spend $300 billion overseas providing safety to some of those fossil fuels from the...
- KGC
: This is the third article I've seen on TR in the past week and a half lending a sympathetic ear...
- Tony...
: The stark contrast of high global subsidies for the fossil fuel industry vs. renewables is even...
- Vailhem
: Solar may only work when the suns out while wind works best at night (energy storage aside). The...
- mattgroom
: They make the point most of us are aware of and that is that in 20 years renewables will be a...
- Bob...
: Perhaps decades for renewables to replace fossil fuels, but do we want it to be large or small...
|
Friday, July 23, 2010
Climate Bill Whimpers, Collapses
Senator Harry Reid opts for a bill without carbon dioxide limits or renewable electricity standards.
Last year, comprehensive climate and energy legislation was well on its way to becoming law. After a version passed the House, pundits were concerned mostly with whether it would be passed in time for the Copenhagen climate talks last December. But Senators balked, and a drive this summer to put some sort of bill together has stalled.
Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev) threw up his hands, giving up on a comprehensive bill for now in favor of a narrow energy bill without any limit on greenhouse gas emissions or regulations to require renewable energy. What's left are measures to hold BP accountable for the oil spill, to invest in natural gas trucks (the pet project of oil and natural gas tycoon T. Boone Pickens), to improve home energy efficiency, and to restore money to the Land and Water Conservation fund.
Reid says he'll still work on a comprehensive bill, but it looks like it's out of play for the year.
Friday, March 19, 2010
U.S. Senators Could Propose Cap-and-Refunds
This approach to cutting carbon dioxide emissions would involve mailing citizens refund checks.
Even as the health care bill grabs headlines, details are beginning to emerge about a new energy and climate bill being pieced together in Washington by trio of U.S. senators. According to Energy Washington, an eight-page outline of the bill includes provisions for something called a "cap-and-refund" approach to reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
That's a alternative to the "cap-and-trade" system proposed in a climate and energy bill that pass the House last June. The Senate version of the bill has gone nowhere, prompting John Kerry (D-MA), Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to work on a new approach. The cap-and-trade system has been effectively branded as an energy tax by those who oppose it. But a cap-and-refund approach might be more appealing. Under such a system, utilities and other emitters would buy allowances for emitting carbon dioxide, with the number of allowances capped to ensure emissions will be gradually reduced over time. Then the proceeds would be mailed out to Americans in the form of refund checks. (It's a system featured in legislation already proposed by Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Susan Collins (R-ME)).
It's likely that not all of the proceeds will go directly back to the people. As much as half could be directed to fund energy research and other government programs.
Both cap-and-trade and cap-and-refund systems can be market-based, allowing emitters to trade allowances and offering them flexibility to cut emissions in whatever way is cheapest. Economists such as Robert Stavins, at Harvard University, say that such market-based systems would be cheaper than renewable energy mandates, which restrict emitters to using renewable energy such as wind and solar when other technologies could be cheaper (such as capturing and storing carbon dioxide).
The Senators haven't formally proposed the bill yet, but it there have been indications it could be unveiled by April 15th.
Wednesday, March 03, 2010
Top Picks from the ARPA-E Summit
Novel technologies from the energy agency's first conference.
| Transonic Combustion's fuel injection system. Credit: Technology Review. |
A conference put on by the new Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E) this week was packed with companies exhibiting intriguing approaches to clean energy. I'll be looking into some of them in more detail in upcoming stories, but here's a few that caught my eye.
Transonic Combustion, based in Camarillo, CA, has developed a gasoline fuel injection system that can improve the efficiency of gasoline engines by 50 to 75 percent, beating the fuel economy of hybrid vehicles. A test vehicle the size and weight of a Toyota Prius (but without hybrid propulsion) showed 64 miles per gallon for highway driving. The company says the system can work with existing engines, and costs about as much as existing high-end fuel injection.
American Superconductor, of Devens, MA, is developing massive 10 megawatt wind turbines that are only possible with the use of extremely lightweight superconducting generators. (Today's turbines typically generate around 2 to 3 megawatts.)
A group out of Michigan State University is developing a natural gas electricity generator for use in hybrid vehicles. The goal: give natural gas cars the same driving range as conventional gasoline cars, making way for their wide adoption.
Oscilla Power, based in Salt Lake City, UT, plans to start testing a novel wave power generator. Wave power is notoriously difficult to harness because of the damage waves can cause to mechanical systems. Oscilla has found a way to use an inexpensive iron-aluminum alloy to generate electrical current, without the need for any moving parts.
Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), spun out of Xerox PARC, is developing a new form of refrigeration that could be three times as efficient as existing forms. It's based on thermoacoustics, a technology that works for cooling at extremely low temperatures (such as for liquefying gases), but hasn't been used for cooling at room temperature (what you need for household refrigeration). The company thinks it's found a way around previous limits to the technology.
|
 |
Current Issue
- Can AIDS Be Cured?
- Researchers are pursuing radical new strategies to eliminate HIV from the body.
|
More Technology News from 
|